Add AI

AI development and automation, built into the work you already do.

LLM-powered features, answers drawn from your own documents, workflow automation and the data pipelines underneath them — added to the tools your team uses today. Tested against your real examples before launch, with a person in the loop wherever a wrong answer would cost you.

Sound familiar?

The problems this solves.

A demo that impressed, then stalled

Someone built a chatbot in an afternoon and everyone loved it. Then it confidently got a policy wrong, nobody could say how often that happens, and it never left the pilot.

Answers buried in documents and inboxes

Your team asks the same questions every week — what the contract says, which process applies, where last quarter’s figures are — and the answer sits in a PDF or in one person’s head.

Hours of reading, sorting and re-typing

Emails, forms and invoices arrive in a dozen formats. Someone reads each one, pulls out the details and types them into another system. It’s slow, and it’s where mistakes creep in.

Data nobody quite trusts

Reports are stitched together from exports by hand, so meetings start with an argument about whose number is right. Any AI built on top of that data inherits the same doubt.

What you get

Concrete things, not adjectives.

An honest use-case check

We look at the task, the data and the cost of a wrong answer, then tell you plainly where AI fits, where ordinary software would do better, and where neither is worth it yet.

LLM-powered features in your product

Drafting, summarising, classifying and extracting, built into the screens your team and customers already use — not a separate chat window nobody opens.

Answers grounded in your own knowledge

Retrieval over your documents, policies and records, so answers come from your sources and link back to them. Each answer shows its sources, so the person reading it can check them in one click.

Automation with a person in the loop

Routine steps run on their own. Anything uncertain, unusual or high-stakes goes to a person to approve first, and you decide where that line sits.

Evaluation and running costs you can see

A test set built from your real examples, rerun before launch and after every change to prompts, models or data. Usage and spend are tracked per feature, with limits, so a busy month shows up as an alert, not a surprise bill.

Data pipelines and dashboards

Pipelines that pull data from your systems, clean it and keep it current, feeding BI dashboards your team can rely on — and giving every AI feature something trustworthy to work from.

How an engagement runs

A demo every two weeks. No six-month silences.

Most projects start with a short, fixed-price discovery and move in two-week sprints you can stop, pause or extend.

From discovery to launch

Weeks 1–2

We learn the game before we play it

What happens

We sit with your users, your constraints and your numbers. Then architecture, scope, and the honest version of what fits your timeline — including the parts we would cut.

What you get

A scoped plan with a real budget, a technical architecture you own, and a working prototype of whichever part carries the most risk.

Fixed priceYours to keepNo obligation to continue

Expertise

The tools, and who it suits.

Technologies we use

AI and automation
LLM-powered applicationsData pipelinesBI dashboards
Languages and frameworks
PythonNode.js
Data and APIs
PostgreSQLGraphQL
Cloud and delivery
AWSAzureDocker

A good fit when

  • People spend hours reading, sorting or re-typing information that follows a pattern most of the time.
  • Your team keeps asking questions whose answers already exist somewhere in your documents.
  • You can describe what a good answer looks like, and you have past cases we can check it against.
  • You want AI inside your existing systems, not another tool to log in to.

Probably not the right fit when

  • The task needs the exact same answer every time, like a price calculation or a fixed rule. That is a job for ordinary software, and we can build that instead.
  • There’s no specific task in mind yet, just a feeling you should be “doing AI”. A short discovery can find a real use for it — or confirm you don’t need it yet.

Questions

AI Development: your questions.

Do we actually need AI for this?

Often not, and we will say so. If a task follows fixed rules, ordinary software does it more cheaply and more reliably. AI earns its place when the input is messy — free text, documents, emails — and an answer a person can quickly check is worth more than no answer at all. Discovery is where we work that out together.

How do you stop it from making things up?

You can’t remove the risk entirely, so we design around it. Answers are grounded in your own sources and show where they came from, the system is built to say it doesn’t know rather than guess, and anything high-stakes goes to a person for review. Before launch, we run it against the test set and agree with you what “good enough” means.

What happens to our data?

You decide where it goes. Production runs in your own cloud accounts, and a model only receives the data a task needs. If a feature uses a hosted model, that data is processed by the model provider, so we check their terms on data retention and training with you before any real data goes near it. Where data is sensitive, we can strip out personal details first or look at options that keep processing inside your own cloud.

What will it cost to run once it’s live?

That depends on how often it runs and how much text each request handles, so we estimate it during discovery from your real volumes. Once live, spend is tracked per feature with limits and alerts. Because the model sits behind a small layer of our own code, you can move to a cheaper or better one later without a rewrite — and rerunning the test set shows whether the new one is good enough before you switch.

Should we use RAG or fine-tune a model?

Most teams should start with retrieval-augmented generation, or RAG: when someone asks a question, your system finds the relevant passages in your documents and hands them to the model with it, so answers stay current and can show their sources. Fine-tuning is better at changing how a model behaves than at teaching it facts, and is worth it in narrower cases. Our article on RAG vs fine-tuning, linked below, walks through the choice in plain English.

How long before we see something working?

You see working software at the end of every two-week sprint, and a focused first release is usually six to twelve weeks. Because testing starts in the first sprints, you find out quickly whether AI is good enough for the task — before most of the budget is spent.

Further reading

From Step2Play Insights.

Often paired with

Related services.

Get in touch

Tell us what you’re building.

Send a short brief and you’ll hear back from a real engineer within one working day — not a sales script.

We use what you send here to reply and to follow up on your enquiry. We never sell it or share it for marketing. Privacy policy.